I have learned a lot about education and the problems it is
facing in EPFE 201 and when I go out in the real world and see something about
things such as tenure, I immediately think back to this class. Speaking of
tenure, I found this concept/issue to be rather interesting. I had never even
heard the word before being in this class and now I can say that I learned from
lecture that tenure has a couple of myths that go along with it. It’s not
impossible to be fired under tenure but it would take an extremely long process
to get rid of a tenured teacher which is why this is a problem. I think some
teachers take advantage of tenure and tend to slack off on their jobs. I’m sure
not all of them do but in the movie “Waiting For Superman” they explained
tenure and showed some animations that prove that a lot of teachers don’t try
to teach as they should if they have tenure. What should we do about tenure? I
think we should either get rid of it completely and figure out a more efficient
way to evaluate teachers. The teachers shouldn’t be able to know what they are
being tested on because then they will purposely do well in that area for the
evaluation. But if we can’t get rid of tenure then we should only carefully
give it to teachers that truly deserve it by having the students take surveys
and having someone evaluate the teacher. Tenure is like many issues, hard to
resolve and perfect but if teachers aren’t teaching students what they need for
the future then what point is there in paying a ton of money for school? After
taking this class it makes me thankful for the education that I received as a
child because many families have it tough such as the ones seen in “Waiting For
Superman.” It was impossible to not feel sorry for them but they and thousands
of others are going through the same thing. There is definitely a lot that
needs to be fixed in education but it’s far from easy.
Thursday, December 5, 2013
BFC Q2) NIU expects you to meet two objectives in EPFE 201: 1) to identify a few key issues in education today and 2) to develop your perspective on those issues. Explain how you have met these objectives by discussing the most important issue we covered (Pink, concussions, funding, teacher quality, tenure, poverty in general…). What is the issue, what is the most compelling information about the issue in your opinion, and what should we do about it?
BFC Q1) A critical theorist would argue that the characters in the Breakfast Club are the perfect example of 1) how SES can impact one’s attitude about education, 2) how SES impacts the way schools order themselves socially (hierarchies), and 3) how SES impacts the ways students treat one another. Choose at least one character and make a case either for or against this theoretical perspective (agree/disagree).
I agree with the perspective of how the characters in the
movie “The Breakfast Club” are a great example of how socio-economic status
impacts education. First off, looking at Claire and Brian you can tell how
social status affects the students’ attitudes about education. Claire has rich
parents and she gets everything she wants and even got detention for ditching
school to go shopping. This shows that she really doesn’t value her education
as she is at the top of the social hierarchy. Brian on the other hand is
towards the bottom of the hierarchy and although his parents force him to get A’s
you can still tell that he appreciates his education more since he’s in many
academic clubs as well. Second, SES impacts the way schools order themselves.
Claire and Andrew are a good example because they are both at the top of the
social hierarchy and they start talking to each other right away in detention.
They kind of try to ignore everyone else because they are far below them.
Finally, SES impacts the way the students treat each other and Bender is a good
example of this. He is probably the lowest on the social hierarchy being the
criminal type and he treats the prep, Claire, and the jock, Andrew,
disrespectfully. He also tries to get to Claire’s level and get in her head by
sexually harassing her and she doesn’t like it. The students argue throughout
the movie because they are so different both by social status and because of
their family lives. They all have extremely different home lives but they still
all find a way to hate their parents either way. So even though socio-economic
status impacts the way students treat each other and view each other the movie
shows that even different people can still be friends in the end.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)